According to the summary provided by the EUAA Courts and Tribunals Network:

"The applicant, a Turkmen national of Russian ethnicity, applied for international protection in Hungary, claiming a risk of serious harm due to compulsory military service in Turkmenistan, poor detention conditions in case of service refusal, discrimination based on Russian ethnicity, and fear of reprisals for critical views of the Turkmen authorities. He had lived in Hungary since childhood and maintained strong personal and family ties to the country.

The asylum authority rejected the application for refugee status and subsidiary protection, established the absence of a prohibition of refoulement, and ordered the applicant’s expulsion and removal. The Budapest Regional Court upheld the rejection of international protection and found that neither the applicant’s political views, ethnicity, nor military service obligations met the requirements for refugee or subsidiary protection under Hungarian and EU law.

However, the Court annulled the decision regarding expulsion and related measures. It held that the authority had failed to carry out a proper assessment of the applicant’s personal and family circumstances, as required by EU law and CJEU case law, before ordering expulsion. The case was remitted to the authority for a new procedure limited to the assessment of expulsion."