EUAA Case Law Database

Latest news for users

Please fill in this survey to evaluate the EUAA Case Law Database and suggest improvements. We welcome your feedback!

***Recent EUAA publications on asylum jurisprudence:

Interpretation and Application of Exclusion Grounds in International Protection (13 October 2026).
EUAA Quarterly Overview of Asylum Case Law, Issue 3/2026 for asylum judgments from June to August 2026. To receive the Quarterly by email, please subscribe here.
Jurisprudence related to LGBTIQ Applicants in International Protection (September 2026).
Jurisprudence related to Asylum Pronounced by the Court of Justice of the EU in 2025 (March 2026).
Jurisprudence related to the Dublin Procedure in 2025 (Feb 2026).

*** Second jurisprudential analysis under the EUAA Case Law Grant is published, drafted by Comillas Pontifical University on Jurisprudence on Asylum Pronounced by the European Court of Human Rights in 2024-2025 (Call EUBA-EUAA-2025-ASYLUMCASELAW), January 2026.

The EUAA Information and Analysis Sector can provide, upon request, online sessions on how to use the EUAA Case Law Database. We also provide presentations on the latest jurisprudence interpreting the Common European Asylum System. For more information, contact us at caselawdb@euaa.europa.eu

Please fill in this <a href="https&#58;//ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/EUAA-Case-Law-Database-Satisfaction-Survey">survey</a> to evaluate the EUAA Case Law Database and suggest improvements. We welcome your feedback!

&#160;

***Recent EUAA&#160;publications on asylum jurisprudence&#58;&#160;

&#160;

<ul>
	<li><a href="/Documents/2026_exclusion_grounds_case_law_EN.pdf">Interpretation and Application of Exclusion Grounds in International Protection</a>&#160;(13 October 2026).</li>
	<li>
	EUAA <a href="/Publications/2026_EUAA_Quarterly_Overview_Asylum_Case_Law_Issue3_EN.pdf">Quarterly Overview of Asylum Case Law, Issue 3/2026</a>&#160;for asylum judgments from June to August 2026.&#160;To receive the Quarterly&#160;by email, please&#160;<a href="/pages/subscribe.aspx" target="_blank">subscribe here</a>.
	</li>
	<li>
	<a href="/Documents/2026_factsheet47_case_law_LGBTIQ_applicants_EN.pdf">Jurisprudence related to LGBTIQ Applicants in International Protection</a> (September 2026).
	</li>
	<li>
	<a href="/Documents/Factsheet42_CJEU_jurisprudence_EN.pdf">Jurisprudence related to Asylum Pronounced by the Court of Justice of the EU in 2025</a> (March 2026).
	</li>
	<li>
	<a href="https&#58;//www.euaa.europa.eu/publications/jurisprudence-related-dublin-procedure-2025">Jurisprudence related to the Dublin Procedure in 2025</a> (Feb 2026).
	</li>
</ul>

&#160;

*** Second jurisprudential analysis under the EUAA Case Law Grant is published, drafted by Comillas Pontifical University on&#160;<a href="/Documents/2026_ECtHR_jurisprudence_asylum-EN.pdf">Jurisprudence on Asylum Pronounced by the European Court of Human Rights in 2024-2025</a> (Call EUBA-EUAA-2025-ASYLUMCASELAW), January 2026.

&#160;

The EUAA Information and Analysis Sector&#160;can provide, upon request, online sessions on&#160;how to use&#160;the EUAA Case Law Database. We also provide presentations on the latest jurisprudence interpreting the Common European Asylum System.&#160;For more information, contact us at&#160;caselawdb@euaa.europa.eu

Get our Quarterly Overview of Asylum Case Law

Click here to subscribe

Read our publications

Latest updates

08/10/2026

EU: The CJEU ruled that Article 10(3)(a) of the Family Reunification Directive must be interpreted as meaning that the application for family reunification by parents whose child arrived in a Member State as an unaccompanied minor but reached the age of majority while their international protection application was still being processed must be submitted within a reasonable time from the moment when the minor was granted refugee status. In addition, the reasonableness of this time must be determined by taking into account the particular circumstances of the case.

The request for a preliminary ruling was submitted

01/10/2026

EU: The CJEU clarified that Member States are precluded from an automatic suspension of the examination of asylum applications lodged by beneficiaries of temporary protection during the period of validity of the temporary protection status. It also held that, in exceptional circumstances, the decision-making period can be exceeded due to an objective impossibility to strictly comply with the time limits, to avoid saturating the asylum system.

According to the court's press release

24/09/2026

EU: The CJEU clarified that Article 17(1) of the Dublin III Regulation must be interpreted as meaning that any Member State may decide to examine an application for international protection submitted to it, including when the Member State responsible for examining that application has been designated pursuant to Article 3(2) first subparagraph of that Regulation.

The request for a preliminary ruling was submitted by the Czech Supreme Administrative Court

06/10/2026

FI: Drawing on the CJEU’s judgment in Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SE, the Administrative Court in Turku ruled that the Finnish Immigration Service could not examine and decide on an application without treating the applicant as a minor, where the applicant had been a minor when submitting the application in another Member State but had reached the age of majority before being transferred to Finland under the Dublin III Regulation

The applicant applied for asylum as a minor in another Member State and had been transferred to Finland under the Dublin III Regulation. He had reached the age of majority before the transfer took place. The Finnish Immigration Service rejected the application for international protection and adopted a return decision. The applicant appealed against the negative...

25/09/2026

FR: The Administrative Court of Nantes ruled that applicants who did not respect their obligations set out by the authorities, could have their material conditions of reception withdrawn only partially on 23 July 2026, in line with the provisions of the 2024 Reception Conditions Directive, to which the administration is required to give direct effect pending the formal transposition of the directive in France.

A.C. and B.C., Armenian nationals, requested international protection on 28 August 2025. On the same day, they accepted the offer of support issued by the French Office for Immigration and Integration (OFII). By decision of 23 July 2026, OFII fully withdrew their material reception conditions on the ground that they had failed to comply with the requirements of the asylum authorities by...

23/09/2026

FR: The Administrative Court of Dijon ruled that for an applicant who was not present for a transfer from France to Belgium in August 2026, the recast Reception Conditions Directive was still applicable because the application for asylum and the transfer decision to the responsible Member State predated 12 June 2026, the date of entering into application of the Pact instruments. Therefore, the court held that the applicant's material conditions of reception could be withdrawn only partially for not respecting the obligations set out by the authorities, in application of the recast Reception Conditions Directive.

A.B., a national of Burkina Faso, requested international protection in France on 2 February 2026. By decision of 30 March 2026, the Prefect of Doubs ordered her transfer to Belgium,...