Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

​​
 

Latest news for users

Please fill in this survey to evaluate the EUAA Case Law Database and suggest improvements. We welcome your feedback!

 

The EUAA Asylum Case Law Grant is open for applications until 30 September 2026, 17:00hrs Brussels time. Do not miss this opportunity!

 

***Recent EUAA publications on asylum jurisprud​ence: 

 

*** Second jurisprudential analysis under the EUAA Case Law Grant is published, drafted by Comillas Pontifical University on Jurisprudence on Asylum Pronounced by the European Court of Human Rights in 2024-2025 (Call EUBA-EUAA-2025-ASYLUMCASELAW), January 2026.

 

The EUAA Information and Analysis Sector can provide, upon request, online sessions on how to use the EUAA Case Law Database. We also provide presentations on the latest jurisprudence interpreting the Common European Asylum System. For more information, contact us at caselawdb@euaa.europa.eu
Get our Quarterly Overview of Asylum Case Law
Click here to subscribe
Read our publications
See more

Latest updates

07/07/2026
COE: The ECtHR ruled that Denmark did not violate Article 8 of the Convention by ordering the expulsion of a Syrian refugee who was sentenced to two years and six months’ imprisonment for 14 offences of money laundering. The court held that after the expiry of the re-entry ban, the applicant could apply for family reunification.
According to the ECtHR's press release, “the applicant, Mr Allabed, is a Syrian national who was born in 1973 and lives in Aarhus (Denmark). Mr Allabed entered Denmark in 2013 and was granted residence as a refugee. By a final Supreme Court judgment of 29 January 2025 he was convicted of, among other offences, money laundering and sentenced to two years and six months' imprisonment. His expulsion from Denmark was ordered with a six-year re-entry ban. Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family...
27/08/2026
DE: The Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig submitted a request before the CJEU for a preliminary ruling on whether the recast Asylum Procedures Directive and the Return Directive preclude national legislation which provides that there is no need to issue a new return decision when a third-country national submitted an inadmissible asylum subsequent application after complying with the obligation to leave for their country of origin following the rejection of the first application for international protection.
The Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig referred a question before the CJEU on whether EU law precludes national legislation which provides that a new return decision is not required when a third-country national lodged an inadmissible subsequent application while the previous threat for deportation was still valid and enforceable, and he has...
16/07/2026
PL: The Supreme Administrative Court suspended the execution of a decision withdrawing refugee status, finding that the right to remain under Article 68(2) of the Asylum Procedures Regulation (APR) unequivocally covers proceedings concerning international protection before the Voivodship Administrative Courts.
On 20 September 2024, the Head of the Office for Foreigners issued a decision withdrawing A.S.'s refugee status, whose nationality was not disclosed. The beneficiary appealed to the Refugee Board, which, on 27 August 2025, upheld the withdrawal decision, and subsequently lodged a complaint with the Voivodship Administrative Court in Warsaw. In his complaint before the administrative court, the applicant requested the interim suspension of the challenged decision pending the outcome of the appeal, which was not granted. The applicant filed an interlocutory...

Resources

Judicial Institutions
See more
Civil Society
See more