Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

​​
 

Latest news for users

Please fill in this survey to evaluate the EUAA Case Law Database and suggest improvements. We welcome your feedback!

 

The EUAA Asylum Case Law Grant is open for applications until 30 September 2026, 17:00hrs Brussels time. Do not miss this opportunity!

 

***Recent EUAA publications on asylum jurisprud​ence: 

 

*** Second jurisprudential analysis under the EUAA Case Law Grant is published, drafted by Comillas Pontifical University on Jurisprudence on Asylum Pronounced by the European Court of Human Rights in 2024-2025 (Call EUBA-EUAA-2025-ASYLUMCASELAW), January 2026.

 

The EUAA Information and Analysis Sector can provide, upon request, online sessions on how to use the EUAA Case Law Database. We also provide presentations on the latest jurisprudence interpreting the Common European Asylum System. For more information, contact us at caselawdb@euaa.europa.eu

Get our Quarterly Overview of Asylum Case Law
Click here to subscribe
Read our publications
See more

Latest updates

03/09/2026
B.C., an unaccompanied minor, arrived in Italy on 3 August 2023 where he applied for international protection and was initially placed in the Reception Centre (Centro di Accoglienza Straordinaria – C.A.S.) in Carovigno, Brindisi. There he submitted a photograph of his birth certificate claiming to be 15 years...
07/07/2026
According to the ECtHR's press release, “the applicant, Mr Allabed, is a Syrian national who was born in 1973 and lives in Aarhus (Denmark). Mr Allabed entered Denmark in 2013 and was granted residence as a refugee. By a final Supreme Court judgment of 29 January 2025 he was convicted of, among other offences, money laundering and sentenced to two years and six months'...
16/04/2026
A Ukrainian national submitted an application for international protection on 14 November 2023. By decision of 7 May 2024, the Head of the Office for Foreigners refused to grant him refugee status and subsidiary protection. The authority found that the applicant had not established a well-founded fear of persecution in Ukraine. It nevertheless considered that, if returned, he would face a serious and individual threat to his life or health arising from widespread violence against the civilian population in the context of the international armed conflict in Ukraine, and that he could not relocate to another part of the country. However, the authority considered that the applicant was excluded from subsidiary protection because he...

Resources

Judicial Institutions
Civil Society