17/04/2024
FI: The Supreme Administrative Court referred questions to the CJEU for interpretation of the Return Directive with regard to detention pending removal
Read More...
|
15/04/2024
FR: The National Court of Asylum ruled that a derived right for international protection as provided under Article 23 of the recast Directive 2011/95/EU was not possible for a minor applicant whose mother benefitted from subsidiary protection based on her own mother's personal asylum application.
Read More...
|
15/04/2024
COE: The ECtHR ruled that Hungary violated the right to liberty and security of a Syrian national under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention for an arbitrary detention of almost six months.
Read More...
|
12/04/2024
FR: The National Court of Asylum provided subsidiary protection to an applicant from Central Sudan, holding that the region is experiencing a situation of exceptional indiscriminate violence which would affect civilians by mere presence there.
Read More...
|
11/04/2024
NL: The Council of State overturned the judgment of the Court of The Hague seated in Amsterdam and held that by hearing the third country national on the third day after submitting her asylum application and then screening on the third day of the rest and preparation period, the State Secretary acted expeditiously to ensure that the border detention lasted as short as possible.
Read More...
|
09/04/2024
NL: The Council of State allowed an interim request to suspend the implementation of a return decision for a third country national, pending the outcome on his appeal against the end of temporary protection.
Read More...
|
09/04/2024
COE: The ECtHR found Poland in violation of Article 3 of the Convention (procedural aspect) and of Article 4 of Protocol No 4 to the Convention for the lack of examination of asylum applications at the border crossing and the collective expulsion of applicants to Ukraine without an examination of whether this was a safe country for them and with a risk of chain refoulement to Tajikistan.
Read More...
|
08/04/2024
MT: The First Hall Civil Court rejected a case concerning an alleged pushback to Libya during a maritime rescue operation, on the grounds that it had no jurisdiction to hear the case as the applicants were residing outside of Malta, and their representative in Malta did not provide valid documentation to prove that he had been granted power of attorney.
Read More...
|