Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

​​​​​Latest registrations are available here arranged by date of insert/registration in the EUAA Case Law Database (not by date of publication).


Norway's flag
Norway
30/12/2025
|
NO: Court of Appeal [Lagmannsrettane]
|
Judgment
|
LB-2025-32772
30/12/2025
NO: Court of Appeal [Lagmannsrettane]
Judgment
LB-2025-32772

A., an Ethiopian national of Oromo ethnicity, requested international protection in Norway in 2015. The Utlendingsdirektoratet (UDI) rejected the request on 20 September 2016. The rejection decision was subsequently upheld by the Immigration Appeals Board (Utlendingsnemnda, UNE) and by the Oslo District Court, with a decision dated 20 December 2024. A appealed the judgment to the Borgarting Court of Appeal (hereafter,...

Hungary's flag
Hungary
17/11/2025
|
HU: Budapest District Court [hu. Fővárosi Törvényszék]
|
Judgment
|
14.K.703.145/2025
17/11/2025
HU: Budapest District Court [hu. Fővárosi Törvényszék]
Judgment
14.K.703.145/2025

According to the summary provided by the EUAA Courts and Tribunals Network:

"The applicant, a Turkmen national of Russian ethnicity, applied for international protection in Hungary, claiming a risk of serious harm due to compulsory military service in Turkmenistan, poor detention conditions in case of service refusal, discrimination based on Russian ethnicity, and fear of reprisals for critical views of...

Germany's flag
Germany
16/01/2026
|
DE: Regional Administrative Court [Verwaltungsgericht]
|
Judgment
|
33 L 585/25 V
16/01/2026
DE: Regional Administrative Court [Verwaltungsgericht]
Judgment
33 L 585/25 V

The applicants, Afghan nationals, were granted admission declarations by the Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI) within the framework of resettling particularly vulnerable Afghans, under the list procedure (human rights list and bridging list). These lists were drafted on the basis of individual reports of threats and proposals from organisations and individuals according to the criteria of a so-called profile grid....

Cyprus's flag
Cyprus
18/12/2025
|
CY: Administrative Court of Appeal [Διοικητικού Εφετείου Κύπρου]
|
Judgment
|
No 12/2025
18/12/2025
CY: Administrative Court of Appeal [Διοικητικού Εφετείου Κύπρου]
Judgment
No 12/2025

B.A., a Syrian national, requested international protection in Cyprus. Following his interview, the Cyprus Asylum Service accepted as credible that, between 2015 and 2018, the applicant had worked as an armed security guard at a hospital in a specific area of Syria, which allegedly cooperated with Israeli security forces. On that basis, it also accepted that the applicant had a well-founded fear of persecution by the...

Cyprus's flag
Cyprus
29/01/2026
|
CY: International Protection Administrative Court [Διοικητικό Δικαστήριο Διεθνούς Προστασίας]
|
Judgment
|
No 2340/2025
29/01/2026
CY: International Protection Administrative Court [Διοικητικό Δικαστήριο Διεθνούς Προστασίας]
Judgment
No 2340/2025

A Syrian national from Idlib, ethnic Arab of Sunni Muslim faith, applied for international protection in Cyprus on 8 January 2024. He submitted that he left his country for financial reasons, as his father is unable to work, he is the eldest child in the family, and must financially support his large family. On 24 August 2025, the Asylum Service notified the applicant of the rejection of his asylum request and decision...

Italy's flag
Italy
30/12/2025
|
IT: Court of Appeal [Corte di Appello]
|
|
RG 5702/2025
30/12/2025
IT: Court of Appeal [Corte di Appello]
RG 5702/2025

On 28 November 2025, the Territorial Commission for the Recognition of International Protection of Caserta declared inadmissible, for lack of new elements, a subsequent application for international protection lodged by a Nigerian national. On 13 December 2025, he appealed, alleging that the accelerated procedure had been unlawfully applied in breach of the mandatory time limits, with the result that the ordinary...

Italy's flag
Italy
10/12/2025
|
IT: Court of Appeal [Corte di Appello]
|
|
RG 2025/6637
10/12/2025
IT: Court of Appeal [Corte di Appello]
RG 2025/6637

On 20 October 2025, the Prefect of Frosinone issued an expulsion order against the applicant, a national of Togo. On the same date, the Chief of Police of Frosinone ordered his detention pursuant to Article 14(1) of Legislative Decree No. 286/1998, and he was transferred to the Repatriation Detention Centre (CPR) of Potenza–Palazzo San Gervasio. The Justice of the Peace of Melfi validated the detention measure on...

Poland's flag
Poland
30/10/2025
|
PL: Voivodship Administrative Court [Wojewodzki Sąd Administracyjny]
|
Referral for a preliminary ruling
|
30/10/2025
PL: Voivodship Administrative Court [Wojewodzki Sąd Administracyjny]
Referral for a preliminary ruling

Case registered before the CJEU under C-797/25

O.T., Ukrainian national, beneficiary of temporary protection, submitted on 29 April 2024 an application to the Provincial Governor of the Dolnośląskie Province for a temporary residence and work permit in Poland. He was legally residing in...

Bulgaria's flag
Bulgaria
26/11/2025
|
BG: Administrative Court Varna [bg. Административен съд -Варна]
|
Referral for a preliminary ruling
|
26/11/2025
BG: Administrative Court Varna [bg. Административен съд -Варна]
Referral for a preliminary ruling

Case registered before the CJEU under C-761/25.

Yu. M., a national of Ukraine and her daughter E.M., were granted temporary protection in Bulgaria, valid until 4 March 2026. E.M. is a minor who has been enrolled in the eight grade for the school year 2025/2026 at a vocational secondary school...

Norway's flag
Norway
06/02/2026
|
NO: Immigration Appeals Board [Utlendingsnemnda (UNE)]
|
Decision
|
06/02/2026
NO: Immigration Appeals Board [Utlendingsnemnda (UNE)]
Decision

A former soldier in the Wagner Group was excluded by the Directorate of Immigration (UDI) from refugee status under Section 31(1)(b) of the Immigration Act for commission of a serious non-political crime, and he was granted a residence permit with restrictions under Section 74 of the Immigration Act. The applicant complained against this decision arguing that he was a privileged combatant, that the Wagner Group...