According to the summary provided by the EUAA Courts and Tribunals Network:

“The Constitutional Court, in examining the constitutional complaint against the judgment of the Supreme Court, reiterated the position of the Supreme Court that the argument with which the applicant in the specific case tried to prove the existence of systemic deficiencies in relation to the asylum system (i.e. the previous conduct of the Croatian police officers after the border crossing between Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Croatia and potential deficiencies in the processing of foreigners in Croatia), cannot be legally decisive and, without other indications of systemic deficiencies, cannot significantly influence the decision to transfer the applicant from Slovenia to Croatia based on Dublin III Regulation. Since there were no COI that Dublin returnees are treated inhumanely during the transfer or after the transfer in the accommodation centres in the Republic of Croatia or that the requests for international protection of Dublin returnees are not processed in accordance with EU law, the Constitutional Court decided that the constitutional complaint was unfounded.”