Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

​​

03/03/2026
DK: The Refugee Appeals Board decided its first cases concerning nationals of Syria since the fall of the Assad regime, holding that no areas in Syria have an exceptionally high level or high level of indiscriminate violence and that there is no real risk for a civilian to be personally affected by indiscriminate violence in Damascus.
03/03/2026
DK: The Refugee Appeals Board decided its first cases concerning nationals of Syria since the fall of the Assad regime, holding that no areas in Syria have an exceptionally high level or high level of indiscriminate violence and that there is no real risk for a civilian to be personally affected by indiscriminate violence in Damascus.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA Information and Analysis Sector (IAS)
Source
Type
Decision
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
National law only (in case there is no reference to EU law/ECHR)
Reference
Denmark, Refugee Appeals Board [Flygtningenævnet], Applicants v Danish Immigration Service (Udlændingestyrelsen‚ DIS), 03 March 2026. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=5850
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The Refugee Appeals Board examined ten test cases concerning Syrian nationals from Damascus or the Rif Damascus provinces, the first to be decided since the fall of the Assad regime.


In all cases, the Board concluded that the general conditions in Syria cannot justify international protection. The Board referred the EUAA's Country Guidance: Syria from December 2025, to conclude that no areas in Syria have an exceptionally high level or a high level of indiscriminate violence and that indiscriminate violence only occurs at a level which is not high and that there is no real risk for a civilian to be personally affected by indiscriminate violence in Damascus.


The Board reversed the decisions of the Danish Immigration Service and granted residence permits to seven persons pursuant to Sections 7(1) and 7(2) of the Aliens Act. Six of these are derived status permits, where the applicant does not have an independent asylum claim, but where the permit was granted based on the applicant's close family connection to a person who has a residence permit pursuant to Section 7. One of the permits was granted to an applicant with an independent asylum basis.


In the other three cases, the Board upheld the refusal of the Danish Immigration Service to provide a residence permit pursuant to Section 7 of the Aliens Act.


Country of Decision
Denmark
Court Name
DK: Refugee Appeals Board [Flygtningenævnet]
Case Number
Date of Decision
03/03/2026
Country of Origin
Syria
Keywords
Derived right to international protection
EUAA Country Guidance Materials
Indiscriminate violence
Subsidiary Protection
Other Source/Information
Press release