The Constitutional Court dismissed a complaint against the decision of the Federal Administrative Court concerning detention of a Syrian applicant pending return. It found that the lower court correctly assessed that the detention pending return and its extension were lawful. It noted also that the lower court duly considered the admissibility of the removal on basis of current country of origin reports on Syria, by assessing both the security and supply situation in Syria as well as the individual circumstances of the applicant. Including the possibility to reach his region of origin. The court cited its conclusion on the assessment on Syria in the case Applicant v Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl‚ BFA), E1520/2025, 18 September 2025. The court concluded, from a constitutional approach, that, in view of country-of-origin information on Syria, it cannot conclude that a negative decision, or a return of the applicant to Syria would amount to a real risk of a violation of Articles 2 or 3 of the ECHR.