Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
08/05/2018
BE: CALL ruled that extend the transfer period from 6 months to 18 months is a disputable administrative legal act

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA Networks
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Dublin Regulation III (Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for IP)
Reference
Belgium, Council for Alien Law Litigation [Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers - CALL], A.Y.V. v Belgium State represented by the State Secretary of Asylum and Migration (Staatssecretaris voor Asiel en Migratie en Administratieve Vereenvoudiging), no. 203 685, 08 May 2018. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=500
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The CALL ruled that an implicit decision by the Immigration Office in the context of the Dublin III Regulation to extend the transfer period from 6 months to 18 months is a disputable administrative legal act. Such a decision must be motivated and be written so that effective judicial review is possible. The Immigration Office lodged an appeal with the Council of State to contest this interpretation of the CALL.


Country of Decision
Belgium
Court Name
BE: Council for Alien Law Litigation [Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers - CALL]
Case Number
no. 203 685
Date of Decision
08/05/2018
Country of Origin
Keywords
Dublin procedure
Original Documents