Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
03/02/2025
NL: The Council of State annulled the negative decision of the District Court of the Hague, seated in Arnhem, in a case concerning a female applicant from Uzbekistan who feared discrimination and prosecution because she was infected with HIV.

ECLI
ECLI:NL:RVS:2025:374
Input Provided By
EUAA Information and Analysis Sector (IAS)
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
National law only (in case there is no reference to EU law/ECHR)
Reference
Netherlands, Council of State [Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State], Applicant v The Minister for Asylum and Migration (de Minister van Asiel en Migratie), 202406731/1/V2, ECLI:NL:RVS:2025:374, 03 February 2025. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=4846
Case history
Other information
Abstract

An Uzbek national applied for asylum on the grounds that she faced discrimination in her home country because she had HIV. Furthermore, she feared prosecution because according to Article 113 of the Uzbek Criminal Code, exposing others to HIV infection is criminalised. The Minister for Asylum and Migration deemed the fact that the applicant had HIV to be credible, however, it rejected the application as it found the risk of discrimination insufficiently serious. The District Court of the Hague, seated in Arnhem, declared the applicant’s appeal unfounded on 30 October 2024, and the applicant lodged a further appeal before the Council of State.


The applicant submitted country information to the minister to support her asylum claim, however, based on the provided reports, the minister deduced that persons from the LGBTQIA+ community in Uzbekistan are at risk of persecution on the basis of the Uzbek Criminal Code, whilst the applicant is a heterosexual woman.


Contrary to the opinion of the district court, the council found that the minister’s position was incorrect, as the law does not distinguish between gender or sexuality, and applies unilaterally to persons infected with HIV who knew about their infection and exposed another person to it, regardless of whether infection actually took place or whether the other person consented to the act knowing that the person had HIV. The council found that the sources submitted by the applicant did not substantiate the minister’s claim that in practice, the execution of the sentence is limited to HIV-positive LGBTQIA+ couples, rather they provided examples of convictions on the basis of sex within heterosexual marriages.


The council concluded that the district court failed to recognise that the minister did not provide a proper statement of reasons for the position it took in regard to the applicant’s alleged fear of criminal persecution because of her HIV infection. It declared the appeal well-founded, set aside the judgment of the district court, and ordered the minister to issue a new decision.


Country of Decision
Netherlands
Court Name
NL: Council of State [Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State]
Case Number
202406731/1/V2
Date of Decision
03/02/2025
Country of Origin
Uzbekistan
Keywords
Assessment of Application
Assessment of evidence/assessment of documents
Country of Origin Information
Medical condition
Vulnerable Group