Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
08/07/2024
LU: The Administrative Tribunal rejected the appeal against an application for temporary protection from an applicant from Eritrea because he did not demonstrate to be a resident in Ukraine on 24 February 2022

ECLI
ECLI:LU:TADM:2024:49121
Input Provided By
EUAA Information and Analysis Sector (IAS)
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection / Council Implementation Decision (EU) 2022/382 of 4 March 2022 establishing the existence of a mass influx of displaced persons from Ukraine
Reference
Luxembourg, Administrative Tribunal [Tribunal administratif], Applicant v Ministry of Immigration and Asylum, N° 49121, ECLI:LU:TADM:2024:49121, 08 July 2024. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=4424
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The case concerned the appeal against the negative decision on a request for temporary protection submitted by an national of Eritrea. The tribunal also rejected the appeal against the negative decision on temporary protection and against the return order.


The Administrative Tribunal rejected the appeal after having assessed whether the applicant met the cumulative requirements of permanent or temporary residence in Ukraine and the inability to safely and durably return to the country of origin. For the first condition, the tribunal noted that the applicant alleged to be resident in Ukraine for studies for the period 1 November 2019 – 30 July 2023, but when the authorities checked the documents submitted by the applicant, they found that the applicant’s passport had stamps with last exit from Ukraine in September 2021 and did not contain any entry stamp for 2022. The tribunal noted that the police authorities found that the applicant has falsified some a stamp to give the impression that he left Ukraine due to the war. Therefore, the tribunal considered that the applicant failed to prove a residence and presence in Ukraine on 24 February 2022, thus since the first requirement was not met it was not necessary to assess whether the return can be safe and durable.


On the appeal against the return order, the tribunal found no proof of risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the ECHR.


Country of Decision
Luxembourg
Court Name
LU: Administrative Tribunal [Tribunal administratif]
Case Number
N° 49121
Date of Decision
08/07/2024
Country of Origin
Eritrea
Keywords
Temporary protection
Torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment