Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

​​

30/01/2024
IT: The Court of Cassation referred a question for preliminary ruling to the CJEU, on the requirement that asylum applicants from countries considered safe pay bail as an alternative to detention while awaiting the outcome of their application for international protection.
30/01/2024
IT: The Court of Cassation referred a question for preliminary ruling to the CJEU, on the requirement that asylum applicants from countries considered safe pay bail as an alternative to detention while awaiting the outcome of their application for international protection.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA Information and Analysis Sector (IAS)
Type
Referral for a preliminary ruling
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Recast Reception Conditions Directive (Directive 2013/33/EU laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection)(recast RCD) and/or RCD 2003/9/CE
Reference
Italy, Supreme Court of Cassation [Corte Suprema di Cassazione], Ministry of the Interior (Ministero dell'Interno) v Applicants, No 3563/2024, 30 January 2024. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=4206
Case history
Other information

Italy, Civil Court [Tribunali], Applicant v Questura di Ragusa, R.G. 10461/2023, 29 September 2023. 

Italy, Civil Court [Tribunali], Applicant (2) v Questura di Ragusa, R.G.10460/2023, 29 September 2023. 

Abstract

Case registered under C-105/24:


The United Civil Sections of the Court of Cassation in Italy decided on the immigration appeals lodged by the Ministry of the Interior against the decrees of the Court of Catania on detention at the border referred to in Article 6-bis of Legislative Decree No 142 of 2015, specifically on the requirement that asylum applicants from countries that are considered safe pay bail of approximately 5,000 EUR to avoid detention while awaiting the outcome of their application for protection. The court made two interlocutory orders to refer the following preliminary question to the Court of Justice of the EU:


“If Articles 8 and 9 of (the recast Reception Conditions Directive), also taking into account the purposes deduced from its recitals 15 and 20, preclude national regulation which provides, as an alternative measure to the detention of the applicant (who has not handed over his passport or other equivalent document), the provision of a financial guarantee the amount of which is established as a fixed amount (in the amount determined for the year 2023 at 4,938.00 euros, to be paid individually, via bank guarantee or insurance guarantee policy) rather than in a variable amount, without allowing any adaptation of the amount to the individual situation of the applicant, nor the possibility of establishing the guarantee itself through the intervention of third parties, albeit in the context of forms of family solidarity, thus imposing methods likely to hinder the use of the alternative measure by those who do not have adequate resources, as well as precluding the adoption of a reasoned decision that examines and evaluate on a case-by-case basis the reasonableness and proportionality of such a measure in relation to the applicant's situation".


Country of Decision
Italy
Court Name
IT: Supreme Court of Cassation [Corte Suprema di Cassazione]
Case Number
No 3563/2024
Date of Decision
30/01/2024
Country of Origin
Unknown
Keywords
Accelerated procedures
Detention/ Alternatives to Detention
Safe country of origin
Other Source/Information
Court of Cassation Press release