Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
01/11/2023
NL: The Council of State rejected the appeal of two Syrian nationals against the inadmissible decision on their applications for international protection on grounds that they are beneficiaries of subsidiary protection in Bulgaria.

ECLI
ECLI:NL:RVS:2023:3965
Input Provided By
EUAA Information and Analysis Sector (IAS)
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (EU Charter); European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
Reference
Netherlands, Council of State [Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State], Applicants v State Secretary for Justice and Security (Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid), 202203963/1/V2, ECLI:NL:RVS:2023:3965, 01 November 2023. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=3928
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The case concerned two Syrian nationals, whose asylum application was rejected as inadmissible by the State Secretary for Justice and Security bon the grounds that they were granted international protection by the Bulgarian authorities, on 26 November 2020 and 12 August 2021 respectively. The applicants appealed against this decision before the Court of the Hague and stated that according to recent amendments of the Bulgarian legislation (Article 42(5) of the Law on Asylum and Refugees, LAR), already granted international protection could be withdrawn on the grounds that applicants did not renew their residence documents within 30 days of expiry.


By decision of 27 June 2022, the Court of the Hague rejected the appeal of the applicants as unfounded. The applicants appealed further before the Council of State.


The Council of State reiterated its findings in a case ruled on the same day, namely Applicant v State Secretary for Justice and Security (Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid). The Council of State concluded that in Bulgaria, the failure to renew the residence permits in time did not automatically lead to the termination of international protection, but merely to the initiation of a procedure in which all facts and circumstances were taken into account before a decision on withdrawal was taken. According to the Council of State’s considerations, withdrawal proceedings were only initiated if an applicant had not renewed the residence permit for at least three years after expiry. The court decided that the applicants failed to make it plausible that their international protection would be terminated because they did not renew their resident permits in Bulgaria. In any case, the Council of State considered that even if their status would be withdrawn in Bulgaria, they could litigate the cases in Bulgaria.


The Council of State decided similarly in other cases pronounced on 1st November 2023:


Country of Decision
Netherlands
Court Name
NL: Council of State [Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State]
Case Number
202203963/1/V2
Date of Decision
01/11/2023
Country of Origin
Syria
Keywords
Minor / Best interests of the child
Secondary movements
Torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
Withdrawal/End/Revocation/Renewal of Protection