The Administrative Court rejected an appeal brought against a decision of the Ministry of the Interior to dismiss an applicant’s request for international protection, as the applicant was to be handed over to Croatia, which was considered the responsible Member State for examining the application for international protection. The Administrative Court also rejected a request for a temporary injunction. 

The Administrative Court considered that there were no barriers to the applicant's transfer because neither the asylum procedure nor the reception conditions would put the applicant in danger of being subject to inhuman or degrading treatment as defined by Article 4 of the EU Charter. Regarding the temporary injunction, the court determined that the applicant had not shown harm that would be challenging to repair, and it had not be proven that the applicant will suffer inhumane treatment in Croatia.

The applicant filed an appeal before the Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal as unfounded after considering and expressing its opinion regarding the asylum system in Croatia in relation to the treatment of applicants and their requests for international protection, who are returned under the Dublin III procedure. The Supreme Court found that there was no presumption of the existence of systemic deficiencies in relation to the asylum procedure and reception conditions that would prevent the transfer. The Supreme Court further rejected the temporary injunction as the request for a temporary injunction could no longer be granted owing to the final administrative decision.