Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
08/03/2023
FR: The CNDA held that the situation of indiscriminate violence resulting from the armed conflict in the Oblast of Khmelnytskyi, in the west of Ukraine, may justify the granting of subsidiary protection under Article L. 512-1 (3) of CESEDA, but rejected the request in this particular case due to the lack of elements of individualization enabling the characterization of a risk of serious harm to the life or person of the applicant.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Revised Qualification Directive (Directive 2011/95/EU on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as BIP for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection- recast)/or QD 2004/83/EC
Reference
France, National Court of Asylum [Cour Nationale du Droit d'Asile (CNDA)], P. v Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA), No 21016856 C+, 08 March 2023. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=3305
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The applicant is a Ukrainian national from the Oblast of Khmelnytskyï, who requested international protection before the invasion of Ukraine by Russia and based her request on political persecution and also invoked the security situation in her country of origin. By decision of 4 March 2021, the Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA) rejected the request of the applicant.


The National Court of Asylum noted that the Oblast of Khmelnytskyï was subjected to several attacks which were targeting mainly the power infrastructure according to data from the UN on 24 October 2022 and that the city of Khmelnytskyï was deprived of electricity and the authorities requested the population to prepare for water cuts. The situation there remains concerning as a nearby nuclear power plant is a potential target by Russian forces. It further noted that overall, the oblast had a reduced number of security incidents, compared to the east and south of the country.


The court concluded that the indiscriminate violence existing in the Oblast of Khmelnytskyi does not reach a level such that there would be serious and proven grounds to believe that each civilian who returns there runs, simply because of mere presence in this oblast, a real risk of serious threat to life or person within the meaning of Article L. 512-1 (3) of the CESEDA. The court thus considered that it was up to the applicants from this oblast to provide all the information relating to their personal situation leading to the belief that they would incur a risk to their life or person within the meaning of the provisions of the CESEDA. In the particular case, the court did not retain any element of individualization enabling the characterization of a risk of serious harm to the life or person of the applicant.


Country of Decision
France
Court Name
FR: National Court of Asylum [Cour Nationale du Droit d'Asile (CNDA)]
Case Number
No 21016856 C+
Date of Decision
08/03/2023
Country of Origin
Ukraine
Keywords
Country of Origin Information
First Instance determination
Indiscriminate violence
Subsidiary Protection
Source
CNDA