Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
31/01/2023
SI: The administrative court submitted a question before the CJEU on interpretation and compatibility with Article 46 of the recast APD of national provision on appeal deadline in accelerated procedure

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Other Source/Information
Type
Referral for a preliminary ruling
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights ; Revised Asylum Procedures Directive (Directive 2013/32/EU on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection) and/or APD 2005/85/CE
Reference
Slovenia, Administrative Court [Upravno sodišče], Abboudnam v Republic of Slovenia, 31 January 2023. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=3303
Case history

European Union, Court of Justice of the European Union [CJEU], Y.N. v Slovenian Republic, C-58/23, ECLI:EU:C:2023:748, 27 September 2023. 

Other information
Abstract

The case is registered before the CJEU under C-58/23 and the CJEU pronounced a preliminary ruling on 27 September 2023, in the case Y.N. v Slovenian Republic.


The case concerned the rejection as manifestly unfounded of an asylum application submitted by Moroccan applicants who based their claim solely on poor living conditions in their country of origin, family difficulties and alleged repression from the Moroccan regime. The applicant has submitted an appeal against the negative decision taken in the accelerated procedure and although it was submitted within the deadline, the applicant underlined that the delay to submit an appeal is too short, namely 3 days which in fact were reduced to one day because the negative decision was notified on 23 December 2022 before a weekend which was public holiday. In such circumstances, the applicant claimed that the appeal deadline was too short and undermined the right to an effective remedy. In addition, the applicant was not able within such a short deadline to find a translator and provide the necessary documents to his representative since the applicant only speaks Arabic and he could not answer to his emails or phone calls. Consequently, the applicant claimed that it was not possible to establish a conversation between him and his representative (they communicated via SMS, with the help of google translate), facts that also led to a breach of his right to an effective remedy.


The administrative tribunal submitted a question to the CJEU for preliminary ruling and interpretation of the Article 46 of the Asylum Procedures Directive concerning the reasonable delay provided by the national legislation for submitting an appeal against a negative decision regarding an application for international protection.


The court submitted the following question:


Must Article 46,paragraph 4, of the recast APD, read in conjunction with Article 47 of the EU Charter, be interpreted as opposing to a national rule, such as article 70, paragraph 1 of the Asylum law, which provides that in order to submit an appeal against a negative decision of an application for international protection considered as manifestly unfounded, in an accelerated procedure, the deadline is 3 calendar days starting from the notification of such decision, including weekends and public holidays, when such deadline can expire at the end of the first working day?


Country of Decision
Slovenia
Court Name
SI: Administrative Court [Upravno sodišče]
Case Number
Date of Decision
31/01/2023
Country of Origin
Morocco
Keywords
Accelerated procedures
Interpretation/translation
Second instance determination / Appeal