Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
25/02/2022
NL: The Court of the Hague (seated in Zwolle) found that the State Secretary violated the principle of due care by not providing legal aid to the applicant at the initial stage of the asylum procedure

ECLI
ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2022:2666
Input Provided By
EUAA Asylum Report
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
National law only (in case there is no reference to EU law/ECHR)
Reference
Netherlands, Court of The Hague [Rechtbank Den Haag], Applicant v State Secretary for Justice and Security (Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid), NL21.19915, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2022:2666, 25 February 2022. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=3277
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The applicant is an Algerian national who applied for international protection in the Netherlands and the State Secretary decided on 30 November 2021 not to process the application in the regular procedure. The applicant claimed that during the registration phase he was not informed of the possibility to apply for legal assistance. When the asylum procedure starts, applicants are usually assigned a lawyer through the Legal Aid Board. The applicant claimed that he received the contested decision on or shortly before 21 December 2021 and that he had no assistance from a lawyer prior to 21 December 2021. On 21 December 2021 an officer from the Council of Refugees requested the lawyer to assist the applicant.


The representative of the applicant mentioned before the court that according to the usual procedure, if an intention to apply for free legal aid is sent when no lawyer has been yet assigned to the case and to the third country national, the IND has to send that intention to the Legal Aid Board in order for a lawyer to be designated.


The Court of the Hague noted that the State Secretary did not contest the assertation and stated that since the applicant has clearly indicated his will to apply for legal aid, there are serious shortcomings in denying his right to access legal assistance in the procedure in its entirety. The court concluded that the State Secretary did not sufficiently and carefully prepare its decision and referred the case back. The applicant was granted legal aid.


Country of Decision
Netherlands
Court Name
NL: Court of The Hague [Rechtbank Den Haag]
Case Number
NL21.19915
Date of Decision
25/02/2022
Country of Origin
Algeria
Keywords
Legal Aid/Legal assistance/representation