Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
22/07/2022
The UN Committee Against Torture held that the deportation of an Eritrean woman facing military service would violate Article 3 of the UN Convention Against Torture.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Other Source/Information
Type
Individual Complaints/Views
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
UN International Covenants / UN Conventions
Reference
United Nations, Committee against Torture [CAT], A.Y. v Switzerland, No 887/2018, 22 July 2022. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=3195
Case history
Other information
Abstract

According to the summary provided in the ELENA Weekly Legal Update of 10 February 2023:


"On the 30th of January 2023, The Committee against Torture (CAT) published its communication A.Y. v Switzerland (CAT/C/74/D/887/2018). The case concerned A.Y., an Eritrean woman, who left her country due to fear to be rounded up for military services. Her asylum claim was rejected by the Swiss Secretariat for Migration and the Court on credibility grounds. The CAT decided that A.Y.’s deportation would violate Article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
 
The Committee first stated that Switzerland failed to afford A.Y. the benefit of the doubt and comprehensively assess her claim. Swiss authorities considered her initial interview as representative for her entire claim and dismissed additional details as fabricated. This initial interview was however very short, and the questions and time given for responses were insufficient. 
 
Second, the CAT decided that Swiss authorities did not provide objective information on Eritrea to address the applicant’s potential risk of torture upon return. The Committee stated that Switzerland’s country information does not reflect Eritrea’s reality. Switzerland further referred to Denmark and the United Kingdom as countries sharing its findings, but the CAT noted that these states are heavily criticised for the objectivity of their sources. The Committee then mentioned that all information points out that individuals illegally leaving Eritrea will be sentenced. Switzerland indicated that the refusal of a state to engage with fact-finding visits is a reason to dismiss the findings of the report and that information from individuals who have fled persecution is less reliable. However, the Committee highlighted that this interpretation would have a dissuasive effect on states’ engagement with their human rights obligations and reduce transparency and accountability. The CAT emphasised that sources from civil society and citizens in exile are more likely to represent reliable and uncensored first-hand accounts. Moreover, the Committee linked A.Y.’s situation to recent findings of the Committee on the Elimination of the Discrimination on Women and the Special Rapporteur on Eritrea. Based on all this, the CAT declared that A.Y.’s faces a risk of being subjected to torture if returned to Eritrea."


Country of Decision
United Nations
Court Name
UN: Committee against Torture [CAT]
Case Number
No 887/2018
Date of Decision
22/07/2022
Country of Origin
Eritrea
Keywords
Country of Origin Information
Military service / Conscientious objection / Desertion / Draft evasion / Forced conscription
Source
OHCHR