Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

​​

07/11/2018
The CJEU ruled on the right to family reunification of a beneficiary of subsidiary protection.
07/11/2018
The CJEU ruled on the right to family reunification of a beneficiary of subsidiary protection.

ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2018:877
Input Provided By
EUAA Information and Analysis Sector (IAS)
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Family Reunification Directive (Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification)
Reference
European Union, Court of Justice of the European Union [CJEU], K and B v State Secretary for Security and Justice, Netherlands (Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie), Case C-380/17 , ECLI:EU:C:2018:877, 07 November 2018. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=295
Case history
Other information
Abstract

This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 12(1) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification. The request has been made in proceedings between, on the one hand, K and B, third-country nationals family members of F.G. (third national country with subsidiary protection status in Netherlands since September 2014), and, on the other, the Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (State Secretary for Security and Justice, Netherlands) (‘the State Secretary') concerning the State Secretary's rejection of an application for a visa for a stay of more than three months for the purpose of family reunification. The Court hereby rules: 1. The Court of Justice has jurisdiction, on the basis of Article 267 TFEU, to interpret Article 12(1) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, where a national court is called upon to rule on a beneficiary of subsidiary protection's right to family reunification, if that provision was made directly and unconditionally applicable to such a situation under national law. 2. Article 12(1) of Directive 2003/86 does not preclude national legislation which permits an application for family reunification lodged on behalf of a member of a refugee's family, on the basis of the more favourable provisions for refugees of Chapter V of that directive, to be rejected on the ground that that application was lodged more than three months after the sponsor was granted refugee status, whilst affording the possibility of lodging a fresh application under a different set of rules provided that that legislation: – lays down that such a ground of refusal cannot apply to situations in which particular circumstances render the late submission of the initial application objectively excusable; – lays down that the persons concerned are to be fully informed of the consequences of the decision rejecting their initial application and of the measures which they can take to assert their rights to family reunification effectively; and – ensures that sponsors recognised as refugees continue to benefit from the more favourable conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification applicable to refugees, specified in Articles 10 and 11 or in Article 12(2) of the directive.


Country of Decision
European Union
Court Name
EU: Court of Justice of the European Union [CJEU]
Case Number
Case C-380/17
Date of Decision
07/11/2018
Country of Origin
Keywords
Family Reunification
Source
CURIA
RETURN