The case was registered before the CJEU under C-484/22:

The question referred was:

Must Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 2008/115/EC be interpreted as precluding, without exception, the lawfulness of a return decision adopted in respect of a minor third-country national, accompanied by a refusal of his or her application for international protection and setting him or her a time limit for voluntary departure of 30 days from the date on which the decision becomes final, where, for legal reasons, neither parent can be returned to a country referred to in Article 3(3) of Directive 2008/115/EC in the foreseeable future and the minor cannot therefore reasonably be expected to leave the Member State either, on account of his or her family life which is worthy of protection (Articles 7 and 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 8 of the ECHR), or is it sufficient that, on the basis of a national statutory provision, the child’s best interests and family life within the meaning of Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 2008/115/EC are to be taken into account, following the adoption of the return decision, by virtue of a suspension of the removal?