Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
31/10/2022
The ECtHR indicated an interim measure to the Government of Belgium to provide accommodation and basic material assistance to an asylum applicant, who lacked adequate reception conditions allegedly due to the saturation of the Belgian reception facilities run by Fedasil.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA Information and Analysis Sector (IAS)
Other Source/Information
Type
Interim Measures
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
Reference
Council of Europe, European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR], Camara v Belgium, No 49255/22, 31 October 2022. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=2854
Case history
Other information

Council of Europe, European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR], Msallem and 147 Others v Belgium, 48987/22, 15 November 2022. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.

Council of Europe, European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR], Al-Shujaa and Others v Belgium, No 52208/22 and 142 others, 13 December 2022. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.

Abstract

The request for interim measure was lodged by a Guinean asylum applicant in Belgium, who was not provided with accommodation and basic material assistance since his application for international protection was lodged in Belgium, allegedly due to the saturation of the Belgian reception facilities run by Fedasil. The ECtHR noted in its press release that this is the first case of its kind and that the court continues to receive similar applications.


According to the ECtHR's press release of 2 November 2022:


"Facts: The applicant, Abdoulaye Camara, is an asylum-seeker of Guinean nationality. After arriving in Belgium on 12 July 2022, the applicant applied for international protection on 15 July 2022. Since then, he has not been assigned a place in a reception facility by Fedasil. He thus applied to the Brussels French-language Labour Court, alleging a risk of serious and irreversible damage to human dignity and requesting that Fedasil be ordered to comply with its legal obligations. On 22 July 2022 the court ordered Fedasil to house the applicant in a reception centre, or else in a hotel or any other suitable facility should no places be available, and to ensure his reception as defined in section 6 of the Law of 12 January 2007, subject to penalties for non-compliance. On 29 July 2022 the court order was served on Fedasil. However, requests from the applicant’s lawyer for Fedasil to provide the applicant with accommodation and basic material assistance remained unanswered. Accordingly, on 12 October 2022 the lawyer had the order served together with a demand for payment and for compliance with the writ of enforcement. Fedasil did not lodge a third-party application to set aside the order, which has in the meantime become final. It has still not been enforced by Fedasil.


Interim measure request: On 20 October 2022, after exhausting all the remedies available to him, the applicant applied to the Court for an interim measure enjoining the Government to enforce the court order and to provide him with emergency accommodation and material assistance to meet his basic needs. In support of his request, the applicant stated that, besides the increasingly cold and damp conditions, he was suffering from hunger and health problems. He also referred to the scabies epidemic among asylum-seekers living on the street, which was worsening as a result of poor sanitation. He stated that he was unable to find a doctor to perform a rapid check-up of his medical problems.


Complaints: Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), the applicant complains that he has not been housed in a reception facility. Relying on Article 6 (right to a fair hearing) in conjunction with Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), he complains about the failure to enforce the order of 22 July 2022 and the lack of an effective remedy. Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), he submits that there has been a violation of his right to physical integrity and hence his private life.


Decision of the Court: On 31 October 2022 the Court decided to indicate an interim measure and to enjoin the Belgian State to comply with the order made by the Brussels French-language Labour Court on 22 July 2022 and to provide the applicant with accommodation and material assistance to meet his basic needs."


Country of Decision
Council of Europe
Court Name
CoE: European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR]
Case Number
No 49255/22
Date of Decision
31/10/2022
Country of Origin
Guinea
Keywords
Reception/Accommodation