Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
12/07/2022
DE: The Regional Administrative Court of Düsseldorf clarified the time limit for sending a take back request.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Other Source/Information
Type
Decision
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Dublin Regulation III (Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for IP)
Reference
Germany, Regional Administrative Court [Verwaltungsgericht], Applicant v BAMF, 12 L 1284/22.A , 12 July 2022. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=2823
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The case concerned the time limit for national authorities to submit a take back request according to Art. 23 (2) Dublin III Regulation. The Regional Administrative Court of Düsseldorf clarified that according to Article 23 (2) Dublin III Regulation, a take back request cannot be submitted more than three months after filing the application for international protection, even if this is less than two months after receipt of a Eurodac hit report as defined this regulation happens.


According to Article 23 (2) subparagraph 1 Dublin III Regulation, a readmission request must be submitted as soon as possible, but within two months of the Eurodac hit report within the meaning of Article 9 (5) of Dublin III Regulation. If the take back request is based on evidence other than information from the Eurodac system, it must be sent to the requested Member State within three months of the application for international protection within the meaning of Article 20 (2) 2 Dublin III Regulation.


Consequently, it is not possible to effectively submit a take back request more than three months after filing the application for international protection, even if this is done less than two months after receipt of a Eurodac hit report.


Moreover, the Regional Administrative Court of Düsseldorf stated that on basis of Article 20(2) of the Dublin III Regulation, an application for international protection is deemed to have been made when the competent authorities of the Member State concerned have received a form submitted by the applicant or an official record. It mentioned the CJEU case law, and that an application for international protection is deemed to have been made if the authority responsible has received a document drawn up by an authority and which certifies that a third-country national has applied for international protection.


Country of Decision
Germany
Court Name
DE: Regional Administrative Court [Verwaltungsgericht]
Case Number
12 L 1284/22.A
Date of Decision
12/07/2022
Country of Origin
Unknown
Keywords
Dublin procedure
Source
asyl.net