Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
19/07/2021
NL: The Council of State validated a Dublin transfer to Croatia in the absence of indices of a situation contrary to Article 3 ECHR

ECLI
ECLI:NL:RVS:2021:1563
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Dublin Regulation III (Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for IP)
Reference
Netherlands, Council of State [Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State], Applicant v State Secretary for Justice and Security (Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid), 202006935/1/V3, ECLI:NL:RVS:2021:1563, 19 July 2021. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=2560
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The applicant, Syrian national, applied for asylum in the Netherlands but the State Secretary considered that Croatia is responsible for processing the application and the Court of the Hague overturned this decision and the State Secretary appealed against, claiming that the principle of mutual trust between Member States has to be applied for Croatia. The applicant complained that he would be subject to pushback if returned to Croatia and to a violation of the Article 3 ECHR.


The Council of State noted that the take back request was sent in accordance with Article 18 of the Dublin III Regulation and that the Croatian authorities were duly informed of the situation before they accepted the request. The Council of State also noted that upon return, the applicant will no longer have the status of illegal migrant, thus he can not be subject to pushbacks. It noted that the treatment of the third country nationals by the Croatian authorities after his illegal border crossing does not automatically mean that he will be treated in the same way as a returning Dublin applicant and it is not apparent from the documents submitted by him that Croatia forwards third country nationals transferred to that Member State under the Dublin Regulation by means of pushbacks to third countries without giving them the opportunity to apply for asylum. 


The Council of State considered that the State Secretary rightly argued that the principle of mutual trust between Member States is applicable with regards to Croatia and that the Croatian authorities guaranteed through the take back agreement that the third country national's application for international protection will be dealt with. 


The AIDA country report 2019 Update contains a section on the living conditions in reception centres, from which it results, among other things, that the facilities and staffing are currently sufficient and that system-related structural shortcomings in the asylum procedure and in the reception system as referred to in Article 3, second paragraph of the Dublin III Regulation do not exist. The Croatian authorities have also guaranteed through a take back agreement that the third country's application for international protection will be dealt with. 


The Council of State allowed the appeal of the State Secretary and concluded that the transfer of the applicant to Croatia can be implemented, as no situation contrary to the Article 3 ECHR has been found.


Country of Decision
Netherlands
Court Name
NL: Council of State [Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State]
Case Number
202006935/1/V3
Date of Decision
19/07/2021
Country of Origin
Syria
Keywords
Access to procedures
Dublin procedure
Reception/Accommodation
Torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment