Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
19/04/2022
CH: The FAC clarified that no individual guarantees must be requested for take charge request for Dublin transfers to Italy

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Dublin Regulation III (Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for IP)
Reference
Switzerland, Federal Administrative Court [Bundesverwaltungsgericht - Tribunal administratif fédéral - FAC], A and B v Swiss State Secretariat for Migration (SEM), D-4235/2021, 19 April 2022. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=2491
Case history
Other information

Switzerland, Federal Administrative Court [Bundesverwaltungsgericht - Tribunal administratif fédéral - FAC], A and B v State Secretariat for Migration (Staatssekretariat für Migration – SEM), No F-6330/2020, 18 October 2021. 

Switzerland, Federal Administrative Court [Bundesverwaltungsgericht - Tribunal administratif fédéral - FAC], A. B. and C. (Nigeria) v State Secretariat for Migration (Staatssekretariat für Migration - SEM), E-962/2019 , 17 December 2019.

Abstract

The applicants, Iraqi nationals, have applied for asylum in Switzerland but the SEM decided to send a take charge request to Italy based on EURODAC findings. The applicants contested the Dublin transfer.


The FAC decided that in the context of a take charge transfer based on the Dublin Regulation, the Swiss authorities are no longer obliged to request preliminary guarantees, including for persons with serious health problems who have not yet applied for asylum in Italy. The FAC made a clear distinction between the two possible situations arising under the Dublin regulation – take charge request when the person has not yet filled an asylum application in Italy and take back request when the person concerned submitted an asylum application or whose application was denied


The FAC noted that after the adoption of the “Salvini Decree” (Legislative Decree 113/2018) in December 2020, asylum and reception conditions have improved for especially vulnerable asylum seekers.


The FAC concluded that the Secretary of State for Migration is not required to systematically request individual guarantees from the Italian authorities for each person with serious health problems before ordering their transfer to Italy under the Dublin Agreement. It may be assumed that Italy guarantees these persons access to appropriate medical assistance and accommodation. However, in the take-back cases, the Swiss authorities are still required to demand sufficient individual guarantees from the Italian authorities.


Country of Decision
Switzerland
Court Name
CH: Federal Administrative Court [Bundesverwaltungsgericht - Tribunal administratif fédéral - FAC]
Case Number
D-4235/2021
Date of Decision
19/04/2022
Country of Origin
Iraq
Keywords
Dublin procedure
Medical condition
Original Documents