Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
04/10/2021
NL: The Court of the Hague referred a case to the CJEU on the interpretation of the principle of mutual trust in Dublin procedures.

ECLI
ECLI:EN:RBDHA:2021:10735
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Type
Referral for a preliminary ruling
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Dublin Regulation III (Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for IP)
Reference
Netherlands, Court of The Hague [Rechtbank Den Haag], Applicant v State Secretary for Justice and Security, NL21.4376 , ECLI:EN:RBDHA:2021:10735, 04 October 2021. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=2035
Case history

The applicant decided to withdraw his appeal and the case was further withdrew the case from the CJEU on 15 February 2022.

A similar case was referred to the CJEU on the divisibility of the principle of inter-state mutual trust between Member State Netherlands, Court of The Hague [Rechtbank Den Haag], Applicant v State Secretary for Security and Justice Netherlands (Staatssecretaris Van Veiligheid en Justitie), NL22.1282, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2022:2305, 18 March 2022.

Other information
Abstract

Case registered before the CJEU under C-614/21


The case concerns a Dublin transfer of a Sudanese applicant to Malta, as responsible Member State under the Dublin III Regulation. The District Court of the Hague decided to refer the case to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling on the scope the principle of mutual trust between Member States. The referring court asked whether human rights violations, precisely pushbacks and the use of detention by the Member State responsible under Dublin III Regulation should result in a prohibition of the transfer, or whether the transferring Member State cannot rely on this principle and must be given the burden of proof to demonstrate that, after the transfer, the applicant will not be placed in a situation contrary to Article 4 of the EU Charter. In addition, the referring court seeks guidance on the burden and standard of proof in such case if it is alleged that the transfer under Article 3(2) of the Dublin III Regulation should be prohibited and whether there is an obligation to cooperate in Dublin procedures and whether, in the event of serious and systemic infringements of fundamental rights with respect to third‑country nationals, the transferring Member State must request individual guarantees.


 


Country of Decision
Netherlands
Court Name
NL: Court of The Hague [Rechtbank Den Haag]
Case Number
NL21.4376
Date of Decision
04/10/2021
Country of Origin
Sudan
Keywords
Dublin procedure
Torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
Other Source/Information
CURIA