Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
22/07/2021
The ECtHR found violations of Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention for the detention pending a Dublin transfer of a mother and her child for 11 days in the Centre of Mesnil-Amelot No 2

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
European Convention on Human Rights
Reference
Council of Europe, European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR], M.D. and A.D. v France, No 57035/18, 22 July 2021. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=1876
Case history
Other information

Council of Europe, European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR], AC and MC v France, No 4289/21, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504JUD000428921, 04 May 2023. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.

Abstract

The applicants are two nationals of Mali, a mother and her daughter, which was four months old at the time of the facts. The first applicant had arrived in France via Italy, after having fled her country of origin due to the fear of being subjected to FGM and forcibly married. After refusing to board a flight to Italy, they were placed in administrative detention in Mesnil-Amelot Administrative Detention Centre No 2.


The ECtHR found a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention, considering that the detention of a four months’ old minor for 11 days, and whose detention ended only due to the interim measure allowed by the court, was excessive and went beyond the severity threshold under Article 3. due to the ill treatment of the applicants who were held in inadequate conditions and considering the age of the second applicant. A violation of Article 3 was also found in regard to the first applicant.


In addition, the court also found a violation of Article 5 (1) and (4) of the Convention as the national authorities had not fact verified that the initial detention was a measure of last resort for which there was no other alternative. None of the courts had taken into account the minority of the second applicant.


Country of Decision
Council of Europe
Court Name
CoE: European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR]
Case Number
No 57035/18
Date of Decision
22/07/2021
Country of Origin
Keywords
Detention/ Alternatives to Detention
Minor / Best interests of the child
Vulnerable Group
Source
HUDOC