Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
10/04/2021
FR: The Council of State annuls a Dublin transfer where the applicant was not informed in a language he understands of the consequences of PCR test refusal

ECLI
FR:CEORD:2021:450931.20210410
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Dublin Regulation III (Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for IP)
Reference
France, Council of State [Conseil d'État], French Minister of Interior v A., N° 450931, FR:CEORD:2021:450931.20210410, 10 April 2021. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=1684
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The applicant refused to undergo a COVID-19 PCR test prior to the Dublin transfer to Sweden and the Administrative Tribunal of Paris ordered the registration of his application for international protection. According to article 29 of the Dublin III Regulation, the six-month time limit for transferring an asylum applicant to the Member State responsible for examining the application can be extended to 18 months if the applicant intentionally opposes his or her transfer. After the 18-month period has passed, the requesting Member State must itself examine the asylum application.
The Ministry of Interior submitted an application to the Council of State for their annulment of the order from the Administrative Tribunal of Paris to register the asylum application.


The Council of State noted that the applicant had not been informed in a language that he could understand that his refusal to do a PCR test would prevent his transfer to Sweden. Therefore, he could not be considered to have intentionally and systematically opposed his transfer and put himself in a situation of absconding in the sense of the article 29 of the Dublin III Regulation and France was deemed responsible for examining his application.


Consequently, the determining authority has seriously breached the applicant right to asylum and acted illegaly, thus the situation has to end having in mind the significant consequences of prolonging the transfer deadline with 12 months.


Country of Decision
France
Court Name
FR: Council of State [Conseil d'État]
Case Number
N° 450931
Date of Decision
10/04/2021
Country of Origin
Keywords
COVID-19/Emergency measures
Dublin procedure
Other Source/Information
Conseil d'Etat