Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
30/03/2020
DE: The High Administrative Court rules on the right of dependent minor to personal interview in asylum and the situation in Syria

ECLI
ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0330.2LB452.18.00
Input Provided By
EUAA Courts and Tribunals Network
Other Source/Information
Type
Decision
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Recast Asylum Procedures Directive (Directive 2013/32/EU on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection) (recast APD) and/or APD 2005/85/CE
Reference
Germany, Higher Administrative Court (Oberverwaltungsgericht/Verwaltungsgerichtshöf), Applicant (Syria) v Administrative Court Osnabrück Judgment, 2 LB 452/18, ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0330.2LB452.18.00, 30 March 2020. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=1590
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The applicant, a Syrian national of Arab ethnic and Sunni religious affiliation, applied for international protection upon arrival in Germany with her mother and sibling in March 2016. The reason for the application were based on the unstable situation and war in Syria. Only the mother was interviewed and gave reasons for the application. By decision of 31 May 2016, the Federal Office for Migration and Asylum granted subsidiary protection but refused the refugee status. Additionally, BAMF mentioned that the applicant will not be interviewed in person during the procedure. The applicant requested before the administrative court to be granted refugee status, by way of an additional action because her brother has evaded military service. The administrative court rejected the request and the applicant appealed before the High Administratve Court, complaing of the fact that she was not heard in the procedure.


The High Administrative Court noted that there is no legal objection to the fact that the applicant was not heard in the proceedings before the Federal Office. The regulations of the AsylG do not provide when minors are to be heard (the applicant did not have the legal age in 2016). Under the Asylum Act, minors are treated as part of the family as a whole (cf. § 14a AsylG). Section 24 (1) sentence 6 of the Asylum Act only regulates that the hearing is not required if if the asylum application for a child born in the federal territory under the age of six has been made and the facts of the case have been sufficiently clarified based on the content of the procedural files of the parents or one of the parents. This means, however, that a hearing (not of this child, but) of the parents is dispensable, who otherwise in the case of underage children - depending on the age of the children - have to be heard in their place or included in their hearing. This does not allow direct conclusions to be drawn as to when underage children are to be heard.


Nor can it be inferred from European law that the applicant should have been heard by the Federal Office before a decision was made. Art. 14 para. 1 subpar. 3 and 4 of revised Asylum Procedures Directive provides: “If a person has formally applied for international protection for persons dependent on him, so every dependent adult must be given the opportunity to attend a personal hearing. Member States can determine in national legislation the cases in which a minor is given the opportunity to be heard personally."


The High Administrative Court dismissed the appeal and has also reviewed the situation of Syrians returning back after applying for asylum in Europe to conclude that the applicant did not prove an individual risk of persecution in case of being returned, in order to justify refugee status.


Country of Decision
Germany
Court Name
DE: Higher Administrative Court (Oberverwaltungsgericht/Verwaltungsgerichtshöf)
Case Number
2 LB 452/18
Date of Decision
30/03/2020
Country of Origin
Syria
Keywords
Country of Origin Information
Minor / Best interests of the child
Personal Interview/ Oral hearing
Political opinion
Religion/ Religious Groups
Subsidiary Protection