EUAA Case Law Database

Latest news for users

*** Please fill in this survey to evaluate the EUAA Case Law Database and suggest improvements. We welcome your feedback!

*** Second jurisprudential analysis under the EUAA Case Law Grant is published, drafted by Comillas Pontifical University on Jurisprudence on Asylum Pronounced by the European Court of Human Rights in 2024-2025 (Call EUBA-EUAA-2025-ASYLUMCASELAW). January 2026.

*** Recent EUAA publications on asylum jurisprudence:

EUAA Quarterly Overview of Asylum Case Law, Issue 4/2025 for asylum judgments from September to November 2025. To receive the Quarterly by email, please subscribe here.
Jurisprudence on LGBTIQ Applicants in International Protection (September 2025) also in FR, EL, IT, ES.
Analysis of jurisprudence on the implementation of the Dublin procedure (June 2025).
Jurisprudence related to asylum pronounced by the Court of Justice of the EU in 2024 (April 2025) also in FR, DE, EL, IT, ES.
Jurisprudence related to Gender-Based Violence against Women. Analysis of asylum case law from 2020-2024 (Feb 2025) also in FR, DE, EL, IT, ES.

The EUAA Information and Analysis Sector can provide, upon request, online sessions on how to use the EUAA Case Law Database. We also provide presentations on the latest jurisprudence interpreting the Common European Asylum System. For more information, contact us at caselawdb@euaa.europa.eu

*** Please fill in this <a href="https&#58;//ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/EUAA-Case-Law-Database-Satisfaction-Survey">survey</a> to evaluate the EUAA Case Law Database and suggest improvements. We welcome your feedback!

&#160;

*** Second jurisprudential analysis under the EUAA Case Law Grant is published, drafted by Comillas Pontifical University on&#160;<a href="/Documents/2026_ECtHR_jurisprudence_asylum-EN.pdf">Jurisprudence on Asylum Pronounced by the European Court of Human Rights in 2024-2025</a> (Call EUBA-EUAA-2025-ASYLUMCASELAW). January 2026.

&#160;

*** Recent EUAA&#160;publications on asylum jurisprudence&#58;&#160;

<ul>
	<li>
	<a href="/Newsletters/2025_EUAA_Quarterly_Overview_Asylum_Case_Law_Issue4_EN.pdf">EUAA Quarterly Overview of Asylum Case Law, Issue 4/2025</a> for asylum judgments from September to November 2025.&#160;To receive the Quarterly&#160;by email, please&#160;<a href="/pages/subscribe.aspx" target="_blank">subscribe here</a>.
	</li>
	<li>
	<a href="/Documents/2025_factsheet39_case_law_LGBTIQ_applicants_EN.pdf">Jurisprudence on LGBTIQ Applicants in International Protection</a> (September 2025) also in&#160;<a href="/Documents/2025_factsheet39_case_law_LGBTIQ_applicants_FR_1.pdf">FR</a>, <a href="/Documents/2025_factsheet39_case_law_LGBTIQ_applicants_EL.pdf">EL</a>,&#160;<a href="/Documents/2025_factsheet39_case_law_LGBTIQ_applicants_IT.pdf">IT</a>,&#160;<a href="/Documents/2025_factsheet39_case_law_LGBTIQ_applicants_ES.pdf">ES</a>.
	</li>
	<li>
	<a href="/Documents/Factsheet%2033_jurisprudence_Dublin_procedure_EN.pdf">Analysis of jurisprudence on the implementation of the Dublin procedure</a>&#160;(June 2025).
	</li>
	<li>
	<a href="/Documents/Factsheet32_CJEU_jurisprudence_EN.pdf">Jurisprudence related to asylum pronounced by the Court of Justice of the EU in 2024</a> (April 2025) also in&#160;<a href="/Documents/Factsheet32_CJEU_jurisprudence_FR.pdf">FR</a>, <a href="/Documents/Factsheet32_CJEU_jurisprudence_DE.pdf">DE</a>,&#160;<a href="/Documents/Factsheet32_CJEU_jurisprudence_EL.pdf">EL</a>,&#160;<a href="/Documents/Factsheet32_CJEU_jurisprudence_IT.pdf">IT</a>,&#160;<a href="/Documents/Factsheet32_CJEU_jurisprudence_ES.pdf">ES</a>.
	</li>
	<li><a href="/Documents/2025_jurisprudence_gender_based_violence_EN.pdf">Jurisprudence related to Gender-Based Violence against Women. Analysis of asylum case law from 2020-2024</a>&#160;(Feb 2025) also in <a href="/Documents/2025_jurisprudence_gender_based_violence_FR.pdf">FR</a>, <a href="/Documents/2025_jurisprudence_gender_based_violence_DE.pdf">DE</a>, <a href="/Documents/2025_jurisprudence_gender_based_violence_EL.pdf">EL</a>, <a href="/Documents/2025_jurisprudence_gender_based_violence_IT.pdf">IT</a>, <a href="/Documents/2025_jurisprudence_gender_based_violence_ES.pdf">ES</a>.</li>
</ul>

&#160;

The EUAA Information and Analysis Sector&#160;can provide, upon request, online sessions on&#160;how to use&#160;the EUAA Case Law Database. We also provide presentations on the latest jurisprudence interpreting the Common European Asylum System.&#160;For more information, contact us at&#160;caselawdb@euaa.europa.eu

Get our Quarterly Overview of Asylum Case Law

Click here to subscribe

Read our publications

Latest updates View all

16/12/2025

COE: The ECtHR ruled that the granting of asylum for a father and as a derived right to his children did not prevent the return of the children to Russia in order to implement a decision under the Hague Convention, since it was assessed that the return to Russia was in the children's best interests.

According to the ECtHR legal summary: "The applicants are a father and his two children (born in 2011 and 2013 respectively). They all used to live in Russia. In 2022 the first applicant took his children to Finland without their mother’s consent. After arriving in Finland, he applied for asylum on his own behalf and on behalf of the...

18/12/2025

EU: The CJEU ruled that in joint return operations, Frontex has the obligation to verify that return decisions exist for all persons whom a Member State intends to include in such an operation and any infringements of fundamental rights occurring during a return flight may give rise to the liability of the Member State concerned and that of Frontex; thus, the court set aside the judgment of the General Court which had dismissed the action for damages brought by a Syrian family after their transfer from Greece to Türkiye.

According to the press release of the CJEU of 18 December 2025: "On 9 October 2016, a family of...

18/12/2025

EU: The CJEU ruled that an applicant’s refusal to be transferred to another reception centre cannot justify withdrawing all material reception conditions or depriving the applicant of the possibility of meeting the most basic needs; however, national authorities may impose a proportionate sanction that respects the applicant’s fundamental rights and dignity, and use their powers of coercion to enforce the transfer.

According to the press release of the CJEU of 18 December 2025: "AF and his child, BF, who was a minor at the time of the facts, are applicants for international protection residing in an accommodation centre...

08/12/2025

NL: The Council of State allowed the appeal of a third country national against the refusal to be granted temporary protection clarifying that legal and valid marriage was sufficient to demonstrate eligibility for this status as provided under Article 15 (1)(a) of the Temporary Protection Directive.

The applicant, a third country national displaced from Ukraine, contested the decision adopted by the State Secretariat for Justice and Security on 26 July 2024 according to which the applicant was not eligible for temporary protection. The negative decision was upheld by a judgment of 3 December 2024 pronounced by the District Court of the Hague. In the appeal before the Council of State, the applicant alleged that the lower court wrongly...

22/07/2025

HR: The Administrative Court in Zagreb dismissed the appeal of a Syrian national from Aleppo, confirming that his reasons for leaving were linked solely to past war conditions, that he alleged no persecution on Convention grounds, and that EUAA COI showing improved security in parts of Syria and the absence of negative consequences for his brother’s refusal of mobilisation excluded refugee status and subsidiary protection under Articles 20 and 21 of the Act on International and Temporary Protection.

A Syrian national born in Aleppo, currently residing in the Reception Center for International Protection Applicants in Zagreb, requested international protection in Croatia on 26 February 2024. He argued that he left his country of origin...

05/09/2025

HR: The Administrative Court in Zagreb dismissed the appeal of a Burundian national against the Ministry of Interior’s rejection of his application for international protection, holding that his claims of mistreatment by CNDD-FDD members and Imbonerakure were not substantiated, that his testimony lacked credibility and corroboration, and that country-of-origin information (COI) showed relative stability in Burundi, insufficient to establish persecution or risk of serious harm under Articles 20 and 21 of the Act on International and Temporary Protection.

G.P., a Burundian national, left Burundi and arrived in Croatia, where he was arrested and issued an order to leave the country. He subsequently travelled to Slovenia, then Italy and...