According to the summary provided by the EUAA Courts and Tribunals Network:

"The Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Administrative Court, which overturned the decision of the Ministry and ordered a new procedure. The Supreme court stated, that it cannot be ruled out that the mere transfer to another Member State of an asylum seeker whose health condition is particularly serious may put him at real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment, regardless of the quality of reception and care available in the responsible Member State. Furthermore, if the asylum seeker submits objective elements, such as medical certificates, which demonstrate that his medical condition is particularly serious and that the transfer could have significant and irreversible consequences, the authorities of the Member State concerned, including the courts, must take this into consideration in the light of the judgment of the CJEU C-578/16 (C.K. and others). The Ministry should have examined the applicant's medical documentation, which was submitted to the Ministry before the transfer decision was taken. Only exchanging or transmitting medical data about the person's physical and mental health under Article 32 of the Dublin III Regulation before the transfer is carried out is not sufficient. That would also run contrary to the applicant's right under Article 27 of the Dublin III Regulation."