Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
23/02/2023
DE: The Administrative Court in Düsseldorf annulled a transfer to Italy, determining that the reception conditions in Italy have deteriorated significantly and are fraught with systemic deficiencies.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA Networks
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
Dublin Regulation III (Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for IP); EU Charter of Fundamental Rights ; European Convention on Human Rights
Reference
Germany, Regional Administrative Court [Verwaltungsgericht], Applicant v Federal Office for Migration and Asylum (BAMF), 8 K 3701/22.A, 23 February 2023. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=3518
Case history
Other information
Abstract

A Pakistani national applied for international protection in Germany. The Federal Office for Migration and Asylum (BAMF) found that the applicant had a visa issued by Italy, and therefore sent a take charge request to Italy. The BAMF then dismissed the application and decided to transfer the applicant to Italy under the Dublin III Regulation and issued an entry and residence ban.


The applicant appealed the decision and claimed that paragraph 60 (5) and (7) of the Residence Act, concerning prohibition of deportation, was applicable in his case, and that the transfer should therefore be annulled. He claimed that if transferred to Italy, he would be at risk of inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 4 of the EU Charter and Article 3 of the ECHR due to systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure and reception conditions in Italy.


The Administrative Court in Düsseldorf stated that, particularly under the new Italian Government, there was sufficient evidence to suggest that reception conditions in Italy have deteriorated significantly and are fraught with systemic deficiencies.


The court noted that irrespective of that and in addition, it was not clear at the time of the decision that the transfer to Italy could be carried out within the six-month transfer period that begins from the issuing of the judgment. By letters dated 5 and 7 December 2022, the Italian Ministry of the Interior asked the Dublin units of the Member States to temporarily suspend transfers to Italy (with the exception of family reunifications with unaccompanied minors) from 6 December 2022, referring to a lack of reception capacity. The court also noted that the passing of time of three months since this announcement already spoke against the fact that rescheduling of the transfer could be completed within the next six months and that the applicant could be transferred. In view of the above, the court decided to repeal the decision in its entirety, thus annulling the transfer.


Country of Decision
Germany
Court Name
DE: Regional Administrative Court [Verwaltungsgericht]
Case Number
8 K 3701/22.A
Date of Decision
23/02/2023
Country of Origin
Pakistan
Keywords
Access to procedures
Dublin procedure
Reception/Accommodation
Torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment