Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
17/05/2023
BE: The Ghent Labour Court annulled a decision of Fedasil requesting an asylum applicant to leave the reception centre considering the person's income, holding that Fedasil did not comply with its duty of care in verifying the evidence and if necessary requesting additional documents.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
National law only (in case there is no reference to EU law/ECHR)
Reference
Belgium, Labour Tribunal [Tribunal du travail/Arbeidsrechtbanken], Applicant (no 2) v Federal Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (Fedasil), 22/792/A, 17 May 2023. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=3458
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The applicant submitted an application for international protection on 27 August 2021, which is still pending before the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons. On 27 August 2021, a mandatory place of registration was assigned to the applicant, lifted on 23 November 2022 by Fedasil as the applicant had been working as an employee with a contract for indefinite duration on Belgian territory for more than 6 months and his total remuneration was higher than that of the living wage. The applicant had to leave the reception facility no later than the first working day following 25 December 2022. The applicant contested this decision claiming that he had been working as interim as of 14 April 2022.


The court noted that Fedasil did not comply with its duty of care in this file, as the calculated data was not accurate and it did not examine whether the situation for the claimant had in the meantime changed between the end of June 2022 and November 2022, the date on which the decision was issued. The court also noted that Fedasil did not hear the applicant party and it did not request the employment and income data from the person and/or third parties.


Thus, the court annulled the contested decision.


Country of Decision
Belgium
Court Name
BE: Labour Tribunal [Tribunal du travail/Arbeidsrechtbanken]
Case Number
22/792/A
Date of Decision
17/05/2023
Country of Origin
Unknown
Keywords
Reception/Accommodation
Source
agii.be