Fedasil abolished the material assistance (accommodation) it provided to the applicant, on the basis that he had been employed in Belgium for more than six months and that his income was higher than the minimum living wage. The applicant contested this decision. The Ghent Labour Court annulled Fedasil’s decision. It ruled that, although the applicant’s situation fulfilled the conditions justifying the abolition of material assistance, the decision was unlawful. The court stated that the agency had failed to take the applicant’s personal circumstances into account and had issued a disproportionate decision. In particular, the court noted that the applicant brought sufficient proof that he could not live a dignified life without the social services of the agency, as it was difficult for him to secure accommodation on the basis of the temporary residence permit, without which he was at risk of becoming homeless, regardless of his income level.