Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
23/03/2023
FR: The CNDA examined in the same appeal decision concerning the father, on the ground that the OFPRA decision is deemed to have been equally taken for the child, the request for protection lodged with the CNDA on behalf of the applicant's minor daughter, born a few days before the first instance decision pronounced by the OFPRA, and who risked being exposed to FGM in the event of return to Nigeria.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA IDS
Type
Decision
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
National law only (in case there is no reference to EU law/ECHR)
Reference
France, National Court of Asylum [Cour Nationale du Droit d'Asile (CNDA)], M.G. v Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA), No 22040447 C, 23 March 2023. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=3415
Case history
Other information
Abstract

A Nigerian national from Benin City requested international protection in France, claiming fear of persecution if returned to the country of origin on account of his homosexuality and a private conflict in which the authorities allegedly cannot provide protection.


By decision of 27 June 2022, the Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA) rejected the request.


On appeal, the applicant claimed, in addition to his fear, that his daughter, who was born a few days before the OFPRA took the decision and for which an individual application had not been lodged with OFPRA, risked being subjected to FGM in the absence of state protection. The submission lodged with the CNDA included a request for protection for his daughter as well.


The CNDA ruled that where specific fears of the child are invoked in support of the appeal of the parent, without a request having been previously filed in the child’s name, the person is entitled to bring such arguments on appeal and upon examination of the appeal the fears of the minor daughter should be examined as well.


The court considered that the fears expressed by the father were unfounded, and that the daughter was exposed to the risk of being subjected to female genital mutilation in the event of her return to her country, because of her membership in the social group of Nigerian girls of bini ethnicity who were not previously subjected to FGM.


Country of Decision
France
Court Name
FR: National Court of Asylum [Cour Nationale du Droit d'Asile (CNDA)]
Case Number
No 22040447 C
Date of Decision
23/03/2023
Country of Origin
Nigeria
Keywords
Access to procedures
FGM/C
Membership of a particular social group
Minor / Best interests of the child
Second instance determination / Appeal
Source
CNDA
Other Source/Information
CNDA Press Release