Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
19/01/2023
BE: The Council for Alien Law Litigation ruled in a case in which the personal interview took place via videoconference on Microsoft Teams that more information was needed on the reliability of Microsoft Teams and compliance with data protection.

ECLI
Input Provided By
Individual Expert
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
National law only (in case there is no reference to EU law/ECHR)
Reference
Belgium, Council for Alien Law Litigation [Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers - CALL], X v Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (CGRS), No 283 208, 19 January 2023. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=3194
Case history
Other information
Abstract

According to the summary provided in the ELENA Weekly Legal Update of 3 February 2023:


"The case concerned an Albanian asylum applicant whose asylum claim was declared manifestly unfounded by the Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons. However, the applicant appealed by contesting the relevance of the Commissioner’s reasoning because of its interview through a videoconference (Microsoft Teams) which arguably lacks confidentiality.

The Council stated that the central issue is whether the personal interview via videoconference complies with Article 13/1 Royal Decree 2003 and the Articles 13 and 44-50 GDPR. In that regard, the Council noted the recent unpublished judgment of the Council of State (n° 254 655) declaring that applicants may challenge this if they consider it necessary.

The CALL stated that in order to adequately assess the issue they require technical knowledge which they currently do not have. Further investigation is therefore necessary and so the two Parties should use all means to address at least the following two aspects: a) Collect all relevant information regarding the reliability of MS Teams; this reliability should ensure that confidentiality is respected as well as the norms governing the possible transfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations and b) whether recourse to external experts or competent bodies such as the data protection authority may be considered necessary. The Council concludes that the contested decision should be annulled so that the Commissioner-General can take the necessary steps to adequately answer the issues raised in this judgment."


Country of Decision
Belgium
Court Name
BE: Council for Alien Law Litigation [Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers - CALL]
Case Number
No 283 208
Date of Decision
19/01/2023
Country of Origin
Albania
Keywords
Data protection
First Instance determination
Personal Interview/ Oral hearing