The case was registered before the CJEU under C-217/22

The Italian Tribunale ordinario di Bologna referred the following questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling:

Question referred

Must Articles 4 and 5 of the Dublin Regulation (EU), particularly in view of the right to an effective remedy laid down in Article 27 of that regulation, be interpreted as meaning that the applicant, who has challenged before the courts of the requesting State the transfer decision adopted by the Dublin Unit of that State in the context of a take back procedure under Article 18(1)(b), is entitled to invoke the infringement by the requested State of the duty to provide information laid down in Article 4 or of the obligation to arrange a personal interview with the applicant under Article 5 of that regulation, and if the answer is in the affirmative, what is the relevance of such an infringement?