Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

​​

14/11/2019
FR: CNDA ruled on the consideration of a social group of women and girls victims of FGM/C in Gambia, specifically women belonging to the Wolof ethnic group.
14/11/2019
FR: CNDA ruled on the consideration of a social group of women and girls victims of FGM/C in Gambia, specifically women belonging to the Wolof ethnic group.

ECLI
Input Provided By
EUAA Asylum Report
Other Source/Information
Type
Judgment
Original Documents
Relevant Legislative Provisions
National law only (in case there is no reference to EU law/ECHR)
Reference
France, National Court of Asylum [Cour Nationale du Droit d'Asile (CNDA)], Applicants v French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA), 19008521, 19008522 and 19008524, 14 November 2019. Link redirects to the English summary in the EUAA Case Law Database.
Permanent link to the case
https://caselaw.euaa.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=1000
Case history
Other information
Abstract

The CNDA overturned the decision of the OFPRA who rejected the asylum request of three female applicants belonging to the Wolof ethnic group in Gambia, on the basis that the prevalence rate of FGM/C in this ethnic group is low (12.3%).


The CNDA noted that children and women who have not undergone FGM/C, constitute a social group in a population in which FGM/C is commonly practiced to the point of constituting a social norm. The court emphasized that the existence of a social group is not dependent of the number of people it is composed of, but on the way the surrounding society and institutions view the members of the group. Thus, the court highlighted that variations in the prevalence rates of FGM/C are useful to measure the presence and evolution of the practice of FGM/C within these populations to establish the possible link between the persecution and membership in the social group of children and women who have not undergone FGM/C. However, the court specified that other factors besides the prevalence  rate must be taken into account  including geographical, ethnic, cultural, social or family factors, and that it is the responsibility of the asylum seeker to provide all the detailed information in this regard to substantiate the risk she faces.


The court stated that in Gambia, even though there is legislation in place which forbids the practice, FGM/C remains a social norm with a prevalence rate of 75.7%. The CNDA noted that comparatively, the prevalence rate of the practice within the Wolof ethnic group is low. Nevertheless, the court argued that the applicants are still at risk of excision, as their grandmothers, who were identified as their main persecutors in the event of their return to Gambia, belong to the Mandinka ethnic group in which the prevalence rate of the practice is 95.3%. The court also argued that the applicants' parents would not be able to protect them, and that their mothers had also been subjected to this practice. Thus, the court held that although the applicant's belong to an ethnic group with a low prevalence rate, due to their direct family environment, the applicants have a well-founded fear of persecution because of their membership in the social group of children, adolescents and women exposed to FGM/C, who are unable to effectively rely on the protection of the Gambian authorities.


Country of Decision
France
Court Name
FR: National Court of Asylum [Cour Nationale du Droit d'Asile (CNDA)]
Case Number
19008521, 19008522 and 19008524
Date of Decision
14/11/2019
Country of Origin
Gambia
Keywords
Assessment of Application
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C)
Vulnerable Group
Source
CNDA